people wallpaper

images World Best People Wallpapers people wallpaper. Download this wallpaper and
  • Download this wallpaper and

  • zj142
    07-29 08:01 PM
    I think they should change the title on their page to How may I harass you? :)

    And unsatisfaction is ganranteed:)

    wallpaper Download this wallpaper and people wallpaper. wallpaper funny people.
  • wallpaper funny people.

  • waitingnwaiting
    05-20 09:32 AM
    How do we get other's in similar situation and see if IV can get some clarificationas to the status and present backlog of background check applicants.

    FBI had eliminated all backlog to less than six months and what happened to USCIS continuing to process the application for cases that FBI has not responded within six months.

    IV can they collect a few applicants and then look into a class action WOM. (writ of Mandamus).

    I do not see any reason why IV should file a lawsuit for you. It will be a waste. On top of that, you have not even contributed $25 ever and now want IV to help you with its resources because you are stuck. I would rather IV work on big problem like recapture than individual problems. You should use a lawyer and pay him to solve individual problem.

    people wallpaper. aubrey plaza kaed
  • aubrey plaza kaed

  • gcny2006
    05-28 03:35 PM
    Talking abt running this site. I think IV should enforce a mandatory $15 per year for access to this site. In interest of full disclosure - I have been a free loader myself for a very long time but have realized its pointless if you are not helping the cause. The people who are visiting this site have one thing in common - They have a BIG problem and if they cannot make a SMALL contribution towards solving that problem this community has no use for them.

    2011 wallpaper funny people. people wallpaper. Romani people Wallpaper
  • Romani people Wallpaper

  • americandesi
    10-15 03:32 PM
    I have this basic question. How would USCIS know that he had used EAD for the second job? As far as I know, the information submitted in I-9 doesn�t go to USCIS. During the H1 extension if he submits W2�s, Paystubs and all documents from the H1 employer alone, wouldn�t it get approved? Can anyone clarify this?

    Gurus! Can you please answer the above so that all ambiguities on this topic are eliminated?


    people wallpaper. Download this wallpaper and
  • Download this wallpaper and

  • nlssubbu
    12-06 12:01 PM
    I asked my attorney the following question. His reply is in caps:

    Q) Is it true that I can enter US on AP and still retain my H1 if I declare at port of entry that I would like to use my H1? I would like to retain and use my H1.


    What is the feed back you guys have received from your legal counsels? Please share.

    I was in that status where my I-94 based on AP expired, but my attorney told me not to worry about it as my status is based on 'AOS'. I also had my H1B extended for 3 years after the I-140 approval, and they informed me the I-94 attached with H1B is still valid and not to worry.

    I also had not faced any issue while going out of US and my return as well.

    This is another grey area where attorneys differ and consult with them before hand, analyze the information provided before taking any decision.


    people wallpaper. ,Na#39;vi People Wallpaper
  • ,Na#39;vi People Wallpaper

  • keepwalking
    05-21 12:22 PM
    Thank you very much for your prompt reply.

    Please let know if you took infopass appointment or help from Congressmen to push for your wife's I485 processing

    Filed at : Nebraska Service Center

    For Wife
    Filed 485 on March 10, Finger printing May 6th, GC Approved May 9th, GC received May 13th

    My Wife was on EAD/OPT based on her student visa (and not on H4)


    people wallpaper. Colonial Marine – Wallpaper.
  • Colonial Marine – Wallpaper.

  • kumar2203
    05-23 08:41 PM

    I have one question about dependent I-485.. I filed I-485 to Texas Service Center under EB-3 in 2007, Applied EB-2 140 to Nebraska Service Center under EB2, ported priority date. Now I have to add dependent 485 appication, which service center I have to send ?

    thanks for your help !!

    2010 aubrey plaza kaed people wallpaper. World Best People Wallpapers
  • World Best People Wallpapers

  • somegchuh
    05-24 03:46 PM
    There is a lot of discussion in various threads about the new. Essentially the questions boil down to the following. Hopefully some knowledgable people can post here.

    1. What happens if your labor is still pending in BEC (2001 thru 2005 cases)?
    2. What happens if you have an 140 pending filed before May 21, 2007?
    3. What happens if you have an approved 140 and about to file 485?
    4. What happens if you are yet to file 140?
    5. With AC 21 gone will you be able to switch jobs using 485 portability?
    6. With AC 21 gone will you be able to join new employer based on H1 receipt?


    people wallpaper. World Best People Wallpapers
  • World Best People Wallpapers

  • bluekayal
    10-17 08:15 AM
    thanks for clarifying.

    hair Romani people Wallpaper people wallpaper. Avatar People Wallpaper by
  • Avatar People Wallpaper by

  • rameshraju11
    11-01 06:03 PM

    since your H1b has not been rejected yet , you still can re-file H1b at the same time
    call USCIS and request for additional time for RFE and send RFE documents for the
    original H1B



    people wallpaper. people Wallpaper
  • people Wallpaper

  • help43
    09-11 05:03 PM
    i am applying for H1-B amendment before going to the stamping

    is it a good step to handle the situation?

    They said like you have been applied for a new H1-B, NOT for Change of status thats y u didnt got the I-94.

    Please advise on these options....

    hot Download this wallpaper and people wallpaper. Funny People Wallpaper
  • Funny People Wallpaper

  • sats123
    03-12 08:00 PM
    Thanks for reply and suggestions.

    I called again today and same story. The representative asked me to refile again by paying $305. He said it cannot be reprinted.

    Application was processed at NSC, I will keep calling every two days until I get a reply similar to what gc28262 got.


    house People HD Wallpaper people wallpaper. People-wallpapers
  • People-wallpapers

  • GCcomesoon
    03-16 03:54 PM

    It seems like we all have to wait till march 27th to understand the impact .Please make us understand how this makes good news for legal immigrants.There is no mention of any thing here.Frankly in the last 10 days after this bill started getting discussed, we have hardly heard anyone speaking about us.Its only guest worker,illegal immigration,border security.
    Its not being pessimistic here ,Please give us some realistic picture.
    We all understand & appreciate each other efforts,time,money spend in this cause.Especially hats off to Voice team.
    Lets hope we all the see the fruits of "labor" soon

    __________________________________________________ _______________
    Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2006
    Posts: 3


    Not to be pessimist but I tend to agree with learning01 that Nothing is going to happen. This is election year and it will be difficult to get such sweeping and comprehensive legislation passed. Having said all this, I will continue to support IV as I think these efforts will eventually pay off.

    learning01, I laud your efforts. However, I am not sure what incentive any employer has to really help with this cause. Sure worth trying though.

    Originally Posted by learning01
    Newt said Nothing is going to happen on this Specter or any other immigration bills in Senate. The conference with House will not agree to anything.

    I also sincerely believe that Nothing is going to happen I say, these senators are doing CYAs; they will bitch it to media, their constituents, hey look, we did attempt these immigration reforms.

    I am talking from my long experience and wisdom and take it from me. The only force that can improve the pitiable conditions of Indian and Chinese due to retrogression and lack of visa numbers is the big corporate employers . Each one whose LC is approved, whose I-140 is approved, who is waiting to file for adjustment of status AND who are indispensable to the employer / work at this stage should write to the HR/ Immigration/ Attorney.

    I am in such a position. I am a technical lead in my IT department. PD Nov 2001. I write about these issues and the difficulties once in a month my team manager, or project manager or Immigration department.

    View Public Profile
    Send a private message to pilid
    Send email to pilid
    Find all posts by pilid
    Add pilid to Your Buddy List

    #14 Today, 09:18 PM
    Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006
    Posts: 51


    I tend to agree too that nothing will happen, too much talking, too much BS, but, I can only hope that the republicans know that they can loose the house control, so, maybe they will prefer to have something more conservative than nothing.

    View Public Profile
    Send a private message to beppenyc
    Find all posts by beppenyc
    Add beppenyc to Your Buddy List

    #15 Today, 09:43 PM
    Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2005
    Posts: 183

    Looks like the committee has brokered a deal :)


    Originally Posted by beppenyc
    I tend to agree too that nothing will happen, too much talking, too much BS, but, I can only hope that the republicans know that they can loose the house control, so, maybe they will prefer to have something more conservative than nothing.

    Check out the following article from the OC register here

    If this is true, this seems to be good news for us. The McCain Kennedy bill is the most pro-immigrant of the bills and if thats what becomes the Comprehensive Immigration Bill, we all might end up happy!

    WASHINGTON – The Senate Judiciary Committee today reached agreement on proposals for a new guest-worker program and a plan to allow the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States to become permanent residents.

    Less than 24 hours after most experts and Capitol Hill watchers believed the committee would be unable to get a bill to the Senate floor by Majority Leader Bill Frist's March 27 deadline, committee Chairman Arlen Specter had brokered deals between some key senators on the complex issue.

    No formal votes were taken and committee staffs were preparing to spend the next 10 days drafting language that would put in place the compromises reached. It appeared that at least a dozen of the 18 members on the panel would be prepared to back this deal. The committee plans to meet first thing in the morning on March 27. It is not yet known whether Frist will allow the panel to finish and send its bill to the Senate floor or if he still plans to bring up a more limited, possibly enforcement-only measure.

    But even if nothing scuttles the compromise between now and when lawmakers get back from recess, and if the Senate passes a bill with these elements, there would remain a steep battle to get agreement from the House. The House passed an enforcement-based measure in December that doesn't include a guest-worker program or a plan for undocumented immigrants in the United States now.

    Early this afternoon, Frist announced his intention to introduce a bill before next week’s recess that would deal with enforcement of immigration laws but will not include any of the controversial guest-worker or illegal immigrant provisions. Officials in Frist’s office say he is doing this to ensure that there is a bill ready on the floor if the committee fails to pass one. If Specter does get a bill out of committee, said Frist press secretary Amy Call, that could be substituted for the majority leader’s measure.

    The most likely scenario, said ardent supporters of immigration reform who were pleasantly stunned by today's events, is that this will end in a stalemate, only to be brought up again in the next Congress. But they say it's important that the Senate go on record as supporting comprehensive change.

    For the first time, Specter, R-Pa., who said he spent hours on the phone last night with Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., agreed to Kennedy's plan to deal with the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. Specter would have allowed these people to work indefinitely but not get green cards. Kennedy wanted to give them a path to legalization.

    Specter agreed this morning with Kennedy's approach, provided that these illegal immigrants would not be able to start legalization proceedings until the backlog of 3 million people now waiting in countries around the world for their chance to come to the United States legally get their green cards.

    The deal reached on a new guest-worker plan says that 400,000 new guest workers would be allowed into the country each year. Under the proposal authored by Kennedy and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., that number would have been unlimited. But Kennedy, a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, agreed to a cap and also agreed that after working for two years, these new guest workers would have to go back to their home countries and reapply for another stint as guest workers, one that could last up to six years. But first they'd have to stay in their home countries for one year.

    Built into this compromise, however, is a chance for these workers to get a waiver and not go home based on how long they have been employed here or if they are considered essential to a U.S. employer's business.

    The plan also allows guest workers to apply for permanent U.S. residency, something not included in either Specter's bill or the other major proposal under consideration, the bill by Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.

    Kennedy essentially compromised with Cornyn, who chairs the immigration subcommittee. The deal takes parts of each of their proposals.

    Not all members of the committee agreed with these compromises.
    Kyl said he still believed the illegal immigrants would get preference over those waiting legally in line overseas because the undocumented would be able to stay in the U.S. and work until their turn at a green card came. Those waiting to come here legally don't have that option, he said.

    And several committee members most opposed to a guest-worker program – most notably Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., were not at this morning's session.

    __________________________________________________ _______________

    tattoo ,Na#39;vi People Wallpaper people wallpaper. Active People Wallpaper by
  • Active People Wallpaper by

  • chanduv23
    11-21 03:45 PM
    maybe u should write to the ombudsman and let them know that its not fair for people who dont have aila attorneys.

    You can do it too :)


    pictures Colonial Marine – Wallpaper. people wallpaper. wallpaper funny people.
  • wallpaper funny people.

  • anu_t
    06-20 09:40 AM
    navin I am also in the simillar situation. Still couldn't decide what to do?:(

    dresses Funny People Wallpaper people wallpaper. ,Na#39;vi People Wallpaper
  • ,Na#39;vi People Wallpaper

  • nanneh
    04-28 08:42 AM
    Please check with your local Indian consulate if they can issue a BC. If you have a current original passport which includes the names of both your parents, it should work fine. Your original BC is not required.

    Link to this service provided by the Consulate General in San Francisco

    Thank you Samir, but this format won't help to me. Can some one clarify to me while submitting our I-485 , do we need our birth certificate which contains both parents information or only father's name is okay?

    I need to know clearly on this subject, In my present BC contains only Fathers information only.

    Pls help me if some one have that specific format which contains both parents information.


    makeup World Best People Wallpapers people wallpaper. People HD Wallpaper
  • People HD Wallpaper

  • Eberth
    10-28 10:12 PM
    hehe, ok lost!

    yeah, and i have lots of trouble on getting new clients, because im a 16 years old high school student, and because of that, people think that is too much money for someone of my age, and others think that a person of my age cant do a professional job, that's the main problem i have :( and i dont know how to go and offer my services,i dont know even what to say ( maybe what reverendflash said with the sign hehe,:smirk: ) also if you could give me some advices, on how to offer webdesign, i'd be greatfull ;)

    girlfriend Active People Wallpaper by people wallpaper. English people Wallpaper
  • English people Wallpaper

  • prioritydate
    08-14 12:26 PM
    This is just my theory. When you don't have much information, you get to think of many theories and here is mine. I believe USCIS is approving direct employees of an organization. For example, they may be giving preference to Microsoft employee, rather than an employee of Patel and Patel INC. I know I may be wrong, but I am just pondering. How can someone explain a person with PD 05/03/2006 with RD 08/01/2007 has much preference over a person with PD 05/03/2006 with RD 07/20/2007? Provided that everything is approved(I-140, Name check etc) Am I missing something here? :confused::confused:

    People may post their answers, proving that I am wrong.

    hairstyles people Wallpaper people wallpaper. Fat People Wallpaper. vymura
  • Fat People Wallpaper. vymura

  • kedrex
    01-13 10:59 AM
    Thanks a lot for the replies.

    I have an infopass appointment for tomorrow. Are the infopass officers qualified to review the file and process it right away?

    08-19 12:17 PM
    Just to state some examples: Several of members probably took CFA level II and III exams in June 2008 and the results were out today. These things further increase cohesion among the people as they share more ground than simply being an immigrant.

    Probably we should add a new forum on non-immigration matters.. and then create sub-forums like.. Education, Certifications, Socializing and so on... and then people can post under these subforums..

    1) these threads should not appear on main/home page under top threads.. otherwise IV will lose focus on immigration matters
    2) there should be a section on main page to "non-immigration" forum...

    just my 2cents.. there can be more & better ways to approach and regulate this..

    But for sure this would be a great idea... Probably a "Jokes" or "Feel Light" sub forum also...

    10-09 09:29 AM
    situation is quite different from CA. True, for first time driver's license, you have to show legal status proof. But, you are issued license for 4 years, irrespective of when your current status expires.
    For DL renewal in CA, it happens by mail. You once again get 4 year license. No status proof required.
    There is definitely no concept of different form of DL in CA where an officer will be able to receogize from the DL, whether is PR or not, as has become the law in Texas.
    CA is quite cool with respect to DL renewals.

    This was in past not now.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment